rockinlibrarian: (tesseract)
Series Intro: to celebrate the 50th anniversary of my FAVORITE BOOK EVER, A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L'Engle, I am filling 2012 with BLOG POSTS EXPLORING EVERY POSSIBLE ASPECT OF THIS BOOK IN GREAT DEPTH. I call it the Year of the Tesseract, and you can see what I've written already by clicking the year of the tesseract tag. There WILL be spoilers for Wrinkle and possibly other books throughout. So just go read it, already. Moving on:
Edit 2018: A newer (and probably better?) version of this post can be found at the GeekMom Blog.

There are characters, in fiction, whom you love, admire, disdain, hate, feel guiltily fascinated with or outright indifferent to. It's an outward reaction, like getting to know a person. But then there are the characters you identify with, the ones whose place you immediately take, the ones you can barely look at objectively because you think, "HEY, THIS IS ME."

That was Meg Murry for me. So profound is this feeling of connection that only upon this most recent, objective, rereading did I realize how little we actually are alike.

Don't be fooled by the glasses and braces. Meg's not a shy, nerdy wallflower at all. Well, she IS nerdy, but not in your typical ace-student way, just in that raised-by-brilliant-scientists-so-your-interests-and-vocabulary-are-a-little-odd way. She's a DELINQUENT. She sasses her teachers and rough-houses just "to try to make herself feel better." She's regularly in beat-down physical fights. She's failing school. She blurts out whatever she's thinking, and sees her most defining trait, for good or ill, as stubbornness.

That isn't me. That is the POLAR OPPOSITE of me.

But whatever her outward expression of it, on the inside is a girl with terrible self-esteem. She's a math genius, but can't see it (and maybe doesn't care), because it's not what people expect of her. She thinks she looks like a monster, even though more than one person sees a lot of potential in her looks (at least one of whom isn't even related to her). She's quick to notice the strengths in other people only to immediately compare herself unfavorably. She's convinced she's a failure before she's even begun.

Usually in stories, across media, crappy self-esteem is an issue either too easily solved ("All you need to do is BELIEVE IN YOURSELF!" "Okay, now I believe in myself-- and look! I did it!") or too easily made fun of ("Don't say anything negative! You'll ruin my self-esteem!") So it's a refreshing switch to watch Meg's character arc develop: how slowly, subtly, she grows-- from a girl convinced everyone else has some vital bit of worth that somehow skipped her, waiting for other people to solve her problems, to a young woman who volunteers to do the impossible because she sees she's the only one who has the remotest chance.

I've seen Meg described as "whiny"-- but what if she is? She IS terribly flawed. But that's the point. Meg needs to learn that she DOES have worth and purpose. She needs to learn to come into her own. But it's a slow, uneven process, just as it is in real life. She's working against deeply internalized insecurities, and it's hard to overcome those. Meg is not cut out to be a hero. Early on she believes everything will be better when her father is found. She gratefully accepts Calvin's sometimes overprotective instincts, and waits for the Mrs Ws to swoop in and save the day. But as time goes on, the more often she stands by her own opinions, makes her own decisions, and sometimes she's not even aware of the progress she's making. And sometimes what seems like a minor choice is really a huge leap-- as when an IT-possessed Charles Wallace is about to lead them to their father. "She wanted to reach out and grab Calvin's hand, but it seemed that ever since they had begun their journeyings she had been looking for a hand to hold, so she stuffed her fists into her pockets and walked along behind the two boys. --I've got to be brave, she said to herself. --I will be." A small choice. Not that noticeable. But this is no longer the girl who expected her five-year-old brother to comfort her during a storm. She's growing.

There are stars going supernova to cut through the darkness-- and then there's the power of love between family. Both are important. The point of Meg and her journey to the reader is summed up in the passage from Corinthians that Mrs Who offers as her final gift to Meg, from which comes the title of the last chapter: "...but God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty. And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are." ---"I don't understand what she said," Meg thinks to herself later, "but I think it was meant to make me not hate being only me."

This is my favorite kind of hero. This is Samwise carrying Frodo up Mt. Doom-- the overlooked underdog who becomes a hero despite their apparent lack of heroic traits. The very small person who steps up to that challenge which only they can meet. It's this kind of hero who reminds us that we all have inherent worth, more than we may ever realize.

Everyone needs to be reminded, sometimes, that they, too, can be a hero. And that's why this is my Most Important Book.

Date: 2012-01-27 07:01 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] ozma914.livejournal.com
Now I need to go back and read it again ...

Date: 2012-01-27 03:10 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] rockinlibrarian.livejournal.com
Ah, my evil plan is WORKING!!!
grrlpup: yellow rose in sunlight (Default)
You may have covered this in another post, but I'm very curious about how you see Meg's eventual grown-up life. Does it fit with her core stubbornness, and is it a comment on what did and didn't make her happy about the family she grew up in? I have tried to get on board with her choices, but ultimately I'm disappointed. I don't think helping out with the biology projects will really use her math skillz that much, nor can I envision her adoring spending that much time pregnant and baby-tending. Am I just projecting onto Meg Everygirl?
I haven't gotten to it YET but I PLAN to, "plan" here meaning "I already have about a third of a post typed up on the subject in a draft email, as a matter of fact." (probably will post it a little later on-- I'm thinking March since it's Women's History Month, but maybe sooner if I get bored of other subjects and that one is more written). In answer I think you ARE probably projecting onto the Meg Everygirl, but that I'M projecting in my answer/take on it as well. It's possible NOBODY is free of projecting! But I honestly am going to try to take an objective look at her choices (like, yes, I think you're on to something about her stubborness and the family she grew up in).
grrlpup: yellow rose in sunlight (Default)
Yay! I will look forward to that. :D

Date: 2012-01-28 12:46 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] elouise82.livejournal.com
The weird thing for me is, I saw Meg's smartness and math genius and focused on that, not her insecurity and uncertainties, and I never really related to her. But, thinking about it, I'm wondering if that's because I read the first two books in my early twenties (or maybe even mid twenties - I keep forgetting how old I am, sometimes it feels like I've been stuck at twenty-four for about five years), and if I would have zeroed in on the more universal feeling of inferiority if I read them as a teen or earlier.

When I re-read Wrinkle a month or so ago, I did love that bit about Meg not letting herself hold Calvin's hand. Such a small thing, making a world of difference.

Date: 2012-01-28 08:23 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] rockinlibrarian.livejournal.com
There's this quote from Daniel Handler I used on a library poster once that I forget exactly now, but it's something like "You never love a book the way you love a book when you're ten." I've always wondered if people just won't appreciate Wrinkle enough if they don't read it as a misfit ten-year-old girl! That connection really makes it for me. But then again, it was all grown-ups who gave it the Newbery, so I suppose it might not be NECESSARY.

Date: 2012-02-02 06:44 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] kim aippersbach (from livejournal.com)
Oh, I'm so excited about the Year of the Tesseract! (Okay, I'm a little behind on my blog reading so I'm late to the party. But this is my kind of party!)

My comment is just going to be "me too, me too, me too"! Book that changed my life, yup. Book meaningful 'cause I read it when I was young and impressionable (and then kept re-reading as I was getting older and being impressed), yup. Totally identified with Meg even though we're totally different, yup.

And one comment about the science: I was in high school biology class when we were learning about mitochondria (guess our elementary school was behind the times; don't remember it from my grade five class!), and I was so excited that something I had thought was fantasy was actually real. A girl that I knew only a little at the time raised her hand and asked the teacher if there were such things as farandolae. The teacher was flummoxed, of course, as was most of the class, but I turned around in my seat to exchange a meaningful glance with my soon-to-be newest friend.

Date: 2012-02-02 02:40 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] rockinlibrarian.livejournal.com
Oh, that's an awesome story! I wish something like that had happened to me in school! I just remember trying to tell other kids about the books and them just looking incredulous and occasionally using the word "weird."

Profile

rockinlibrarian: (Default)
rockinlibrarian

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 27th, 2025 07:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios