http://Angela Gayan Galik/ ([identity profile] angela gayan galik) wrote in [personal profile] rockinlibrarian 2014-02-15 07:03 pm (UTC)

Good Words part 2

(Oops, I forgot to not be anonymous on Part 1. Sorry! That was me...)

Ok, I don't usually like fan conversations that much (like you were saying about the Tumblr culture) but I DO like pop culture artifacts like T-shirts or whatever ... So I have a Sherlock wallpaper on my computer right now (The one that says "Why can't people just THINK?"). It's my work computer and let me tell you, when I go into my office after a bizarre work conversation, I often do look at Sherlock and say "I know, right???" My good friend who introduced me to the show came in and I showed her the wallpaper and she was like, "Yeah, man, gotta love those cheekbones!" I seriously did not even know that was a thing! The effect is lost on me. I just really don't care. I'm not attracted to him in that way.

Also I love the line, I forget which episode, where John said Sherlock just turned up his coat collar to look cool. I totally resonate with that. Now when I put my sunglasses on to go into school even when it's not really that sunny, I know why I'm doing it. And I wish I had a coat collar to turn up to make myself look cool.

And re the whole season/series thing, THANK YOU! That's what I am always saying to Sam when he's bitching about how can any show go for two years without any new episodes, and what's with having only three episodes in a season. (IT'S NOT A SHOW.)

And finally, the cold-blooded murder thing. For some reason I did not find it shocking at all. (I mean, yes, in a plot development way, because what happens next??? But not in a moral/ethical way.) Like I said on FB, I do not understand the distinction between this and other types of crime-stopping killing. How is that cold-blooded??? Like you said, maybe lukewarm -- because the whole point was to spare Mary and thus John, unless I read that completely wrong. It was certainly emotionally motivated. I don't want to be seen as not being for justice and democracy and what-all, but honestly, can we admit that those processes are flawed, as currently in place in America and the UK? Is it better to follow the law just because it's a law? (I'm asking rhetorically, not challenging you, Amy!) Is it better to get a lot of police officers, soldiers, innocent bystanders, etc. killed to do something the sanctioned way? I'm not saying whether it is or it isn't; I really think it's a false distinction. One might be more appropriate to a particular context than another, but I sincerely hope that solving that question isn't the end of human moral/ethical evolution -- I would rather move on from "what's the right way to stop/punish murderers" to SO what can we do to create a world in which people are not so often moved/driven/encouraged/inspired to commit murder? (And whatever other crimes against their fellow humans' happiness and well-being.)

Ok, I really believe that that is it for now. That was the longest comment ever. Instead of writing about Sherlock on my blog, I wrote about it on your blog LOL -- but I agree -- after watching series 3 I wanted to talk about it, and in a fun conversational way. So thank you for providing the forum!

Much love!
Angie

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org